Tuesday, 18 February 2025

Beware the Catheters!

 
During your service as a hospital porter, if take your job as seriously as it should be, it is not just the ravages of management incompetence and malevolence you will have to deal with. Some of your colleagues will also try to take advantage of you, both portering and civilian. They have various motives for doing so. Sometimes it is for profit, in terms of manipulating you into taking on more than your fair share of the workload. Some will do it just to make themselves look good in front of others; sometimes it just makes them feel good, giving them a sense of personal power. I've discussed examples previously, see: https://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.com/2022/02/lets-just-help-each-other-out.html. Very often you will be blamed for problems that are not your fault. The reason for this is because you are diligent and reasonable and therefore it is simply easier and quicker to blame you than to take the real culprit to task when all he will do is whine and grumble back. Always be honest, if something is your fault then admit it and apologize; but if it is not then stand your ground like a giant statue. A bit of friendly pranking and ribbing is inevitable in portering because it is an almost exclusively male environment, but some lodge behaviour can cross a line into something more serious. I call problem HP's of this type "catheters", because they take the piss.

Another example happened when I was being trained for theatres and the other theatre porters were teaching me how to use a floor scrubber and "sucker", a vacuum cleaner capable of handling wet material. The scrubber is a machine with a rotating plate on the bottom onto which a brush or abrasive pad it fitted which we use to clean the floors of the operating theatres. I was already familiar with the scrubber and sucker because I'd used them in Delivery Suite, although those were a slightly different design, see: https://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.com/2022/02/delivery-suite.html. After showing me how to operate the machines the other theatre porters left me alone to clean a trauma theatre, but minutes later they came rushing back in. "What are you doing, Ben!?" demanded the deputy senior, an alcoholic named Monty (not his real name; and calling him an alcoholic doesn't exactly narrow it down much either). Two other porters were with him watching.  "Eh?" I replied. "You're doing it wrong! Look." Monty snatched the control handle from my grip and switched it on. "Do it this way... watch." He scrubbed a pair of lanes across the floor and then handed it back to me. I carried on, but he instantly stopped me again. "No, no no! Can't you get it right?" Monty once again took the scrubber and demonstrated for me. I was baffled because I couldn't see any difference between how he was doing it and I was; and I said so. I asked him to be more specific, but he just said: "Watch!" We went through this process about five times before Monty was satisfied that I was scrubbing the floor correctly and left me in peace to get on with it. It was only much later that I realized what that conversation was really about. Monty was showing off his expertise and authority in front of the two other porters by aggressively correcting me, even though there was nothing to correct. He was gaslighting me. I was already using the machine properly. The whole thing was a charade; Monty was posing for the two other porters and using me to do so. I could give you numerous other examples of this being done to me. I was too young and naive at the time to understand at first, but later on I learned. Just because I don't want to put others down doesn't mean that some others don't want to do it to me. One thing I've never even considered doing is using a dignity statement against a brother porter, but if there is any time I might have considered it, it was having to fight back against the catheters.

Saturday, 15 February 2025

New Lucy Letby Panel

 
See here for essential background: https://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.com/2024/07/is-lucy-letby-innocent.html.
Because of legal reporting restrictions, nobody in the media was permitted to give out information about the trial of Lucy Letby until the verdict. Once that verdict was reached they all started like greyhounds out of the trap. The restriction was to ensure Lucy Letby got a fair trial, which on reflection seems rather futile. A new panel has been assembled to discuss the case and it has decisively recommended an appeal or retrial. The panel consists of experts in neonatal medicine, including some whose testimony was used in the trial. The leader is Dr Shoo Lee, a University of Toronto researcher. He wrote a paper in 1989 that the prosecution presented against Letby and now Dr Lee says that this evidence was misused. They go on to explain how they believe Letby was simply a victim of bad luck; the record of her duty periods caused it to look statistically significant that she happened to be there when the babies died, but it was just coincidental. Most of the babies died of natural causes and those who didn't were victims of medical malpractice. As I said in the background article, unlike some other people I know, I doubt very much that the hospital were aware of this and used Lucy as a scapegoat; if this were the case we'd see nurses being thrown in jail every week. What's more there is a medical negligence case ongoing against the Countess of Chester trust over the babies' deaths and injuries anyway. Despite this, I would not be surprised if the panel are correct and that the Letby case deserves a judicial review. I'm not somebody who puts down hospital porters, obviously; but I don't think I'm qualified enough to say for sure. However, I do understand that nobody caught Lucy red-handed. In fact there is no direct evidence against her at all. Her journal is not a confession; it could have been a dream diary for all we know. Recording ones thoughts and feelings in a periodic way is often used as a part of psychotherapy. Yes, it was unprofessional of her to fixate on the details of the babies' relatives on social media, but that doesn't mean she had anything to do with the deaths. That action is really just a product of her private thoughts and feelings, as much as her journal is. Dr Dewi Evans, the prosecution's key witness, rejected the findings of Dr Lee's panel. Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce8y28ny1n0o. The panel has many supporters including Peter Hitchens and David Davis MP. Here is Davis debating the subject with a believer in the original verdict: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4PqkWV4vY0. We'll now have to wait to see how the Review Commission responds. Apparently the Letby cause has spawned numerous online conspiracy theories... I look over my shoulder in innocent confusion! Nevertheless, we live in a country in which prisons are notoriously filling up with innocent people like a reservoir in a rainstorm. How media silence helped Lucy Letby get a fair trail I cannot imagine. If you are a nurse, or another medical professional including porters (of course!) and civilian PAM's; are you next? Are you going to be arrested and spend the rest of your life in prison because of incompetent and irresponsible police officers and lawyers?