Wednesday, 23 December 2020

Return to Oz

 
The Festive Season is a time for films on TV. One of the great holiday favourites is the classic fantasy, The Wizard of Oz; however it had a less famous sequel made in 1985 called Return to Oz. This second film is very different in many ways to the original. It is not a musical and has a much darker tone; in fact it has some horror elements. It has some excellent special effects. It is set a few months after the original, following Dorothy's return to Kansas from the Land of Oz. She is obsessed with her experience in the magical kingdom and badly misses the friends she made there, the Scarecrow, the Tin Woodman and the Cowardly Lion. Her parents start to worry about Dorothy's mental health. They dismiss her ravings as hysteria and are concerned that she cannot forget what they believe was nothing but a hallucination when she received a head injury during the tornado. They decide to take her to a doctor specializing in electrical brain stimulation. For a brief period during the turn of the twentieth century, doctors believed EBS could cure mental illnesses. What it did instead was make the patients worse by causing brain damage, like it did to the Aston character in Harold Pinter's The Caretaker. The supposed hospital Dorothy is taken to looks like Dracula's castle and the matron wears a dark vampiric dress. The first two people she meets are a pair of porters pushing a trolley onto which she is secured with leather straps like a prisoner for execution. It's an extremely disturbing scene and obviously terrifying for Dorothy, who is played by a pre-teen Fairuza Balk, which is odd seeing as Judy Garland in the original is clearly a good few years older, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EXoqJKE6Eg. To cut a long story short, Dorothy escapes and ends up back in the Land of Oz.
 
As with The Wizard of Oz, a lot of Dorothy's experiences in Return to Oz, as well as the characters she interacts with, are seemingly connected to her original life in Kansas; and so the possibility is never eliminated that her adventure really is all just a dream, something purely internal to her imagination. She reaches the Emerald City to find it in ruins. It has been sacked by the evil "Nome King" and the protagonists from the original film have been imprisoned. The ruins of the city are patrolled by "the Wheelers", a group of strange four legged humanoids with wheels instead of feet. It is clear that these are based on the porters Dorothy encountered at the hospital. Their locomotion even makes the same squeaking sounds that the un-oiled wheels of the porters' trolley did; and they are played by the same actors, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WM0RFE3QGAU. Could this be an example I could add to my article Hospital Porters in the Media? In that case it is our strangest portrayal as all. We begin as ghoulish assistants in an electrical brain torturing facility and turn into freaky four-wheeled evil clowns. I'm not sure what the implication is.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.com/2016/12/hospital-porters-in-media.html.

4 comments:

  1. Having been the victim of a psych hospital during treatment for a major head injury caused by a drunken driver and witnessed many other victims in subsquent trips to visit prisoners in Homerton Hospital, Chase Farm Hospital and others your account gave me terrible flash backs to my ECT and other deliberate adjustment punishments. I cannot watch these kind of movies particularly when they include ECT, and confinement. However my experiences on the receiving end of hospital thuggery and involuntaryy experimentation has given me a good grounding for my work with the traumatised.

    At the time I was trapped in a hospital but I never guessed that they would widen the scope opening it to the entire UK making involuntary forced medical treatment compulsory as they are trying to do with the kill V*****e using corporate police.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry to hear that, Keith. One of the reasons RTO flopped was because it was far too grim for its target audience, children; many of whom were fans of the original. I do wonder where these film-makers get their ideas from. How much do they and how much are they willing to say? Sometimes they use their movies to make statements as hints that they could never say outright in public. Best wishes to you.

      Delete
  2. I have just watched it yesterday; believe it or not but i don't remember it being shown ever in Polish TV while i was a kid/ teenager (up until like 1998), despite the fact that Disney productions were always met with great acclaim in our country. Nevertheless, it is bit eery. I mean - Michael Jackson/ Diana Ross version of "Oz" had some weird elements in it, yet this beats it by a mile. Clay animators worked also on "The Adventures of Mark Twain" from 1985, which also depicts some memorable supernatural Evil forces. As for Disney company, back in the 80's they even dared to dabble into dark fantasy/ horror, with "The Watcher in the woods" (starring Bette Davis) and "Something wicked this way comes" with Jonathan Pryce. Unique times for them, indeed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Cabal. Very sorry! Only just seen this comment awaiting moderation. Don't know why I never got a notification. I also have noticed Disney getting more adult as time passes.

      Delete