It's just been announced that an NHS nurse has been found
guilty for murdering some of his patients. Victorino Chua was jailed for life
after being convicted of killing two patients at Stepping
Hill Hospital
in Stockport , Greater Manchester. The police have found
out that it's possible that Mr Chua didn't even have an approved nursing
qualification anyway. He wrote a chilling confession letter that shows that he
killed people simply as a way of letting off steam; "There's a devil in
me!" he says, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-32795255.
Of course there have always been nurses, and other health care professionals,
who kill in the course of their duties, but it seems that this is becoming more
and more common. In fact it's barely twenty years ago that a notorious nursing serial
killer was caught; Beverly Allitt, the so-called "Angel of Death",
had murdered four children on the acute paediatric ward in Lincolnshire
where she served as a state-enrolled nurse. She had also attempted to murder
three others and had seriously injured six more; some were left with permanent
disabilities as a consequence, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCrhsqFlXHk.
The Oxford Radcliffe Trust, the management of my old hospital, seems to have
been particularly badly hit. In 2006 a staff nurse Benjamin Green was convicted
of murdering two patients and injuring fifteen others at the Horton
General Hospital
in Banbury, part of OxRad, see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/oxfordshire/4756905.stm.
At my own unit, the John Radcliffe
Hospital we have yet to have our
first murder, but we have had a spate of horrific non-lethal violent crimes
committed by nurses. Most recently Andrew Hutchinson, a man I knew, was found
to be a serial rapist who targeted unconscious women in the Emergency
Department, see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3057742/Nurse-29-filmed-raping-two-female-patients-anaesthetic-worked-Oxford-s-John-Radcliffe-Hospital-jailed-18-years.html.
Amazingly I remember how Hutchinson
once reprimanded me for using a bedpan base as a container for cleaning detergent;
his cheek is unbelievable! Another man I knew in the very same department was
Oliver Balicao; he was sacked after having sex with a sixteen year old girl in
the hospital toilets. He was cleared of rape, but following an investigation he
went on to be convicted of raping two other girls at the JRH, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-11914580.
Can that be coincidence? How many offenders like these, and worse, are walking
round on the loose, yet to be caught. Will we get our first murder at some
point? Being a conspiracy theorist I have to ask if there's some kind of mind
control operation going on. It makes me laugh... because if it didn't I would
cry... when I hear the Daily Mail ask
about why nothing was done to investigate Andrew Hutchinson because for three
years they had suspected him of "inappropriate behaviour." Perhaps
they were too busy sacking porters for making comedy videos with their friends,
see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/how-i-became-ex-hospital-porter.html.
When I was a theatre porter some of the staff also suggested that I should not
be working there because of my "erratic behaviour", like watching Teletubbies on TV and saying that I was
proud to be a porter. In the end I was forcibly transferred out of the
department; more on that another day. It is interesting that all the most
serious crimes committed in NHS hospitals are being committed by civilians. If
it is not nurses then it is doctors like the serial killer Dr Harold Shipman.
Also security guards at the JRH were always being arrested for violent actions,
fraud or theft etc. I know of no misdemeanour as grievous as the ones I've
reported on ever being carried out by an NHS porter. However, when some adverse
incident did happen at the hospital the fingers always pointed at the porters first before any investigation had
even begun. Just goes to show, doesn't it? Another overall effect of Victorino
Chua's murder spree is the increase in Big Brother surveillance in NHS hospitals
and that nurses have to police each other when handling certain drugs or
carrying out certain procedures, see the article about Chua linked above and
also: http://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/big-porter-is-watching-you.html.
Tuesday, 19 May 2015
Wednesday, 13 May 2015
St Theo's Day 2015 Fliers
The fliers for this year's St Theo's Day are finished.
Pretty soon I shall print and distribute them. This year, as with last year, I
have produced two different fliers, one for the Oxfordshire hospitals on my
doorstep; and another to be distributed to other institutions around the
country. I will send the second national flier by post, addressed to the
Porters in those institutions.
Wednesday, 22 April 2015
JR Porters ballot for Strike
I could write a long and very depressing book about the various
and numerous ways the portering service at the John
Radcliffe Hospital
has gone downhill since I started out there as a porter in the late 1980's; the
background articles below will give you an overview. The malaise experienced by
the porters is mirrored in the civilian services too; nursing, medicine,
paramedics etc. Just a few days ago a situation emerged which is the inevitable
result of this degeneration and anybody in the know who did not predict this disaster
is a fool, see: http://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/a-crisis-2015.html.
Since my own very suspicious dismissal from the Hospital Portering Service,
see: http://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/one-year-on.html,
things have got even worse. I am in regular contact with a JR porter who
supplies me with news and information from the inside that I wouldn't otherwise
be able to know... never mind who... therefore it was no surprise to me when
this was published by the local branch of our trade union UNISON, see: http://www.ouh.org.uk/index.php/constituencies/oxford-radcliffe-trust/133-survey-shows-carillion-staff-in-ouh-are-underpaid-bullied-and-exploited.
In fact this is exactly what I myself experienced; however the situation has
considerably deteriorated since January 2012. (In fact, seeing as now I have a
civilian job, food on the table, a roof over my head and all the other
essentials of life... how much do I really
regret being sacked from the hospital?) Despite UNISON's admirable attempt to
improve things with their "Respect" campaign, my contact tells me the
abuse of staff as described in the above article still goes on. Just a month
ago he informed me that everyone was bracing themselves for some huge bombshell
and last week it detonated. I need to explain some background: the JR porters'
employment circumstances are very complicated. A company called Carillion plc
runs the Facilities departments via a PFI- private finance initiative deal.
However the contracted staff are National Health Service employees who are
"seconded" to Carillion. A large proportion of the Facilities crew,
over a quarter, are not actually employees though, neither of the NHS Trust nor
the outsourcer; they are just agency placements who have no contractual rights
to the job they do. Despite the constant reassurances that they are just going
through a "trial period" and that they'll be offered a proper job if
they make a good impression, some agency staff have been at the hospital for
over two years in that limbo state; working there, but not really a part of the
team.
Now Carillion want to introduce further changes to a service
already depleted, demoralized and weakened by upheaval. Firstly they want to
axe six senior porter posts, that's the principle supervisory grade; these they
aim to replace with two directly-employed Carillion "customer service
managers". Secondly they want to end the rotary shift system in which
porters take it in turns to provide the different sessions of the twenty-four-seven
patient service at the hospital. This would be replaced by a fixed roster of
permanent regular shifts; so one porter would work permanent earlies, another
permanent lates and another permanent nights, with separate weekend staff etc.
This would seriously reduce pay levels; seeing as weekends, nights and unsocial
hours are paid at an enhanced rate or with a bonus. It would also reduce a lot
of the enjoyment of the work through losing the interest, excitement,
professionalism and variety of rotary shiftwork. My contact suspects that
Carillion will not offer any nightshifts to the existing staff at all and will instead
employ their own night porters directly, therefore not paying them the NHS
directed enhanced rates of pay. UNISON have asked Carillion to withdraw their
proposal and Carillion have refused. There have been further meetings and
UNISON have emphasized how the Carillion proposal will be a detriment to
patient care, which it certainly will. Carillion are still digging their heels
in, but they have postponed the introduction of the new system. The mood of the
porters is rebellious and there will be a strike ballot unless Carillion scraps
it completely. Obviously I'm not a porter any more, nor am I a UNISON member; I
have no say at all in what happens, but you can guess how I would vote in the
ballot if I could. Industrial action in a hospital is a very serious matter. If
the trains go on strike a commuter might end up late at the office, but if the healthcare
professions go on strike people might die. However how many people have died
due to government policy towards the NHS? Scroll down and see the background
links for an answer. The government have been allowed to get away with their
nefarious plots partly due to NHS workers' reluctance to take industrial action;
because we all know the consequences for our patients if we do. This is the dilemma
we face, and the government have not hesitated to exploit it. However, I would
say that we're now in a situation in which it far more harmful to the patients,
on a long-term basis, not to strike than it is to strike. So I say to my Extremely
Proud and Dignified Brother and Sister Porters, do it! Down tools! I'll be on
the picket line with you, even though I'm not longer one of you.
See here for
background: http://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/nhs-sign-hacking.html.
Thursday, 9 April 2015
A&E Crisis 2015
The Accident and Emergency departments in hospitals across
the whole country have descended into a cataclysm of endemic failure to
"meet their targets". The system that has been in place for several
decades now is that the performance of National Health Service organizations
has been judged mathematically. A complicated network of statistics has been
introduced and this has caused all kinds of problems, as Adam Curtis explains
in his brilliant documentary, The Trap,
see: http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/145347/The_Trap_Fuck_You_Buddy_BBC/.
Therefore the A and E departments of NHS hospitals are set quantitative limits
on how they treat their patients. For example, every patient has to be seen by
a doctor or nurse within four hours of their admission to the department. If
the department fails to achieve this then it is listed as a black mark on the
management's records. In the terminology of the hospital this is known as
"breaching". I recall several times at weekends when the very
stressed-out sister would complain that a senior hospital manager had phoned up
asking: "How are things today? I hope we haven't had any breaches so
far..." I can sympathize with that manager though because he was
frightened that if the department suffered too many breaches then he would get
into trouble and may even be relieved of his position. It's been revealed in
the news that during last winter the entire system collapsed. 7.4% of patients
breached, this is way below the redline limit of 5%. In Northern
Ireland it was particularly bad; the breach
level was almost 20%. This news page allows you to check the proficiency of
your own local trust: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-25055444.
My old hospital, the John Radcliffe in Oxford ,
is at 87.1%, this puts it in the lower half of the league table and certainly
way outside the small Premiership of trusts who succeeded in achieving their
targets, less than a quarter overall.
The Department of Health will deal with this crisis and all
the negative publicity surrounding it in the usual way; they'll kick out the
people they hold accountable, the senior managerial grades, and replace them
with eager young newcomers. Then they can tell the general public that they've
taken action to solve the problem... Only they haven't. Do they really think
the staff at hospitals fall short in this way because they're incompetent or
lazy? The truth is that successive governments, no matter what ruling party is
elected, have squeezed the NHS to death between a huge increase in workload
together with a reduction in staffing levels. I saw this myself. Many times on
busy afternoons, ambulances were queued up in the entrance bay and I had to
relay gas cylinders to them so that they wouldn't run out. I would regularly be
tackled by nurses urgently saying: "Ben, could you move this patient right
now please, he's about to breach!" Some hospitals called major incidents
to try and avert the crisis; but of course this cannot be done on a routine
basis. The thing is, the rules forbid hospitals calling in extra staff at any
other time, which is insane. The nurses and doctors... not to leave out the
porters as well naturally... are doing everything humanly possible, but they're
serving in a system that is being deliberately degraded so that it is ripe for
full spectrum privatization. This destruction is virtually complete, see: http://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/allyson-pollock-at-tedx.html.
Unfortunately it is now too late to "save the NHS!" To bring back
effective free public health care in Britain
we will need to introduce a completely new system from brand new foundations. Of
course this will not be possible until the vultures who destroyed the previous
service are exposed and brought to justice. I'm well aware that the question
over public healthcare is moot without taking into account more fundamental
issues that conventional NHS campaigners will not address, such as Big Pharma
and cancer cures etc, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2010/04/nutrition-no-defence-against-cancer.html,
however this doesn't mean that the future of the conventional medical system or
its privatized replacement is a non-issue.
Saturday, 21 March 2015
Big Porter is watching You
Something has happened at my hospital that I predicted long
ago when I was there. I have found out from a contact currently serving in the
John Radcliffe porters... never mind who... that CCTV has been installed in the
portering departmental facilities. Two have been placed in the department's
office in order to protect sensitive paperwork, like disciplinary records and
sickness forms etc, from being accessed by unauthorized persons... obviously
the safes and locked filing cabinets the portering office used to use are
obsolete technology and in this day and age we need to leave all documents
lying around in the open. The porters at my hospital no longer have a lodge in
the traditional sense; areas designated for portering use are just alcoves with
a few chairs or a corner with portable partitions if we're lucky. However when
I was there and we did have a lodge, I said that one day we'd be monitored by management
via CCTV while in it. CCTV was originally introduced into the hospital for
security purposes, as were electronic door locks. However, and I predicted this
as well, those door locks are today used by management to monitor the location
of the security guards exactly like in a local hotel I've referred to, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2010/07/big-brother-rules-go-out-window.html.
And so we now see CCTV being adapted from the purpose it is supposed to be for
into something else entirely. This is why, when it comes to Big Brother, we
have to deal with capabilities, not professed intents. I said this over the
school fingerprinting issue, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/all-people-to-be-microchipped-within.html.
It could be that we porters will once again be given a proper lodge, a room
with a rest area, kitchen, lockers etc; but when we are you can bet it will
have that little brown dome fitted to the ceiling.
Saturday, 7 March 2015
Wittgenstein on "that Dress"
Two weeks ago a young bride from the Western Isles of
Scotland put a photograph of her wedding dress on social media and it caused a
viral sensation. The photo was not very good quality and together with the
dress' intricate lace embroidery it created an inadvertent optical illusion.
Some people saw it as a white dress with gold lace, others as a blue dress with
black lace. The lady who wore it at her wedding was inundated with messages
asking her exactly what colour the dress really was. However, as always, it
takes the common sense of a hospital porter to solve this mystery, or it would
if he were still alive. Ludwig Wittgenstein was professor of philosophy at Cambridge
University and an expert on
language, logic, comprehension and perception; he was also a pharmacy porter at
Guys Hospital
in London . What would that great
hospital porter... an occasional amateur part-time philosopher... have made of
"that Dress"? He might have thought that it was just the "aspect
switching" of perception. He used the famous drawing of the
"rabbit-duck" by Joseph Jastrow as an analogy, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-31662317.
Do you see a rabbit
or a duck?
This drawing has this perception ambiguity deliberately
built in. What you see will depend on your comprehension of the image and you
can even choose between the two simply by thinking about it. There are many
other examples of this, like the spinning ballerina animation. However, with
the dress it's different. People report that they cannot choose what colour
they see the dress by changing their minds, so it's not an aspect that they can
voluntarily switch. It's more likely that the dress photo has happened to have
just the right features that it causes different displays in the brains of
different people. In this way it's revealed a kind of colour-blindness that is
not pathological and is naturally universal to all humans. We know that animals
like dogs and cats see colours differently to ourselves all the time; it seems
within a species there is also some variation. One thing's for sure, there is a
lot of variation in the success of fashion design and that the company that created
this now famous dress, Roman Originals, is going to enjoy a huge boost in
sales, rather like the lucky lady who produced the "sexist comet
shirt", see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/sexist-comet-shirt.html.
Nevertheless the insights of Ludwig Wittgenstein are a good starting point for
considering this conundrum... if fact the insights of any hospital porter are good for considering any conundrum!
Friday, 27 February 2015
Jimmy Savile- the NHS knew
The inquiry into the crimes of the celebrity and former
hospital porter Jimmy Savile continues, and it's been revealed that his
offences in various hospitals where he served were considerable. Sixty-three
people have come forward to accuse him at Stoke
Mandeville Hospital
alone, one of the fourteen in which he served. He sexually assaulted patients,
staff and visitors; over half were under sixteen including a young girl he
raped in her bed on a ward, and a fourteen year old boy he groped in the X-ray
department. The youngest was just five years old at the time. He particularly
targeted the world famous spinal injuries unit at Stoke Mandeville because so
many of the patients were immobilized. He also sexually harassed nurses, but
despite this he was given accommodation in the nurses' home. Complaints were
filed against Savile as long ago as 1968 yet absolutely nothing was done about
it and he continued to serve as a porter until 1992, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31637937.
The most shocking revelation was the testimony of "Jane", a victim of
his at the Leeds General Infirmary. It's clear from her report that Savile had
a number of collaborators among the staff. In fact other porters used to
deliver children to a room in the basement where he carried out his attacks.
Nurses laughed at her when she told them when what had happened and warned her
not to be "silly", see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28031538.
Several people have described Savile's actions in the NHS an "open
secret"; this mirrors the situation at the BBC perfectly, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/esther-in-new-year-honours.html.
The Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt (I must be careful how I say that!) blames
Savile's celebrity allure; and it's true that the cult of fame can run deep in
people's hearts. However there must be more to it than that. I know that the
NHS is loaded with corruption. I myself witnessed a lot of this during my own
service and I'll describe some of this in fuller detail in future posts, but
suffice to say for now that the NHS suffered from endemic
"groupthink". A climate of inferred collaboration can break out
almost anywhere. The chilling results of the Milgram experiment are very
revealing. This famous psychological test involved putting people in a
situation in which they were fooled into thinking that they were torturing
somebody else to death with repeated electric shocks. The experiment revealed
that so long as an authority figure ordered them to do so, most subjects were
willing to comply, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcvSNg0HZwk.
Everybody is so shocked about what happened with Savile; they gasp and say:
"How could this have happened!?" Well, this is how. This is how institutional collusion takes place and it
happens naturally, easily and instinctively without a word being spoken between
anybody. Hopefully this will shut up those who bleat on about how there was
"no conspiracy!" and that it was just an "extraordinary
oversight!" and how Savile was "extremely lucky to get away with what
he did!" Most psychologists believe that groupthink is an inevitable and
unavoidable part of human nature; perhaps, but I'm not certain. Those in power
do seem to go to an awful lot of effort to promote groupthink and its
associated mindsets; if it were "just human nature, mate!" why would
they need to? See: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/thats-just-human-nature-man.html.
Not all of the subjects in the Milgram experiment were willing to carry out
their supposed deadly duty, sixty-five percent did. That is a majority, but not
an overwhelming one. So we can only hope that the thirty-five percent who
cannot be ordered to aid and abet atrocities grow in number.
See here for
background: http://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/jimmy-saviles-hospital-crimes.html.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)